as observed in last few days if people are understanding and the administration is vigilant,strict,an eye is kept on antisocials,and the leaders are very understanding in giving their statements then no untowards incident can occur. now the critics are seeing the role of media. direct telecasts without editing not give the right message,and even create confusion. it is very necessary for peace in country that the telecasts should be edited. earlier when it was the age of news papers the editors were very learned and use to study in all aspects. many channels and spokesperson not followed the instructions of court not to explain the court order but many gave statement in the court premises itself. their was lot of variation in the statements given. on such occassions it is the role of media and channels to see to it. i saw that junior jounalists who had not even not got their official copy and was present on the court premises gave their conclusion in few minutes though even the law experts and others are still studying the fact. heading of the programmes telecasted afterwards wre of double eanig, a richshaw puller was telling on way to me that minesare found on site and one judge has sad it. to gain t.r.p., the channels started discussion with panels. commentig on ten thousand page judgement needed many days to study. how the experts came to give their comments. even those spritual leaders who were far away from their bases can comment .the only statement which was possible that day was to give statement to utter thanks to public for cooperation. to thank all leaders who gave thir message and statements seeing the hope for development of india, i am greatly thankful to famous firebrand leaders of many reputed parties and organization for their beautiful ,matured,and short stements. it has helped a great to make people in discipline. really a discipline in political parties can help a great to improve the country and the wrong will itself elimanate who to fulfill and to get cheap publicity deliver speeches agaist party agenda and idealogy and the party heads have to handle the situation. election strategy can not be followed in all times. i request the all tv channels head to look to find out a system to screen the views of a person before telecast, no early conclusions, can prevent such persons who go out of the topic. i was surprised that many senior jounalists,and even many other leaders who were called or connected in discussoon were not acting as a person to prevent confusins and were going out of the topic. i dont know that why the channels were competing with each other to bring a experts panel programme when at the moment understanding many senior people were not available. such programmes can be given after full study and preparation time to expert and anchor or presenter .so that discussions may be not out of topic and perfect. ....
so what all i want to mention on sesitive occassions senior and expericed people should be present on sources of news . it is not easy to extract the reality from senior and experienced profeesionals,leaders,organisation heads. experience makes the man perfct in all field. simply shoting and creating havoc is not journalism or reporting. many times in past immature and wrong reporting had given a wrong message. even in direct telecast the camera team sees that the person on air is going out of topic and can create panic atonce he can cut the telecast to studiuo or on site team can not understand we have the technology the producers and controllers of the programme can do the job. direct telecsts should be always supervised by a senior or experienced person and the govt. regulatory authorities shuld be very strict in national interest.
najeeb khan
agra-282005,india
No comments:
Post a Comment