the role of media is very important in india. still people form their views, retaliation,and conclusions by the news of media. as i also wrote earlier that something should be restrained and edited by the publishers before telecast. live telecasts without editing can create confusions. recalled on the day of decision of babri masjid ramjanambhumi case the advocates gave their views and till then the copy was also not received. even the court had directed not to translate in or explain the decision till the order is in hand. but few in which was a lady laWYER ALSO TO COME BEFORE CAMERA WAS SHOUTING .OTHERS WAS SHOUTING . BUT THE ACTUAL SITUATION CLEARED TO COMMON WHEN SOME SENIOR ADVOCATES CLEARED THE DECISION. I SAW PEOPLE IN AGRA THAT THEY WERE WERE RETALIATING DIFFERENT. EASY LANGUAGE IS UNDERSTOOD ONLY BY COMMON. THE POSITION CLEARED AFTER FEW MINUTES WHEN THE ANCHORS AT STUDIO CLEARED THE DECISION. .PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND MANY SYSTEMS, I SAW WHEN DECISION WAS TO COME BY SUPREME COURT IN THIS MATTER SOME OPPORTUNISTS WERE CREATING HAVOC THAT TODAY SOMETHING IS TO HAPPEN AND EVEN MANY ESTABLISHMENTS CLOSED THAT DAY. THOUGH IT WAS DWCISION ON ONLY DECISION OF TRIPATHI APPLICATION TO postpone for some time. after wards programmes on many channels, live comments and those called on panel instead of thanking people for their wise cooperation were talking of jinnah to jilani. there was of no concern of this matter the man on panel started on religion but the procer behind cut it immediately. such people are opportunists and only want to communalise the issues. the statement of jilani advocate of wakf board was not a heading for news it was a lawyer comment paid for it. what imam did with chisti need no repeted telecast, becuse such who people forget to come on platform and gain favour of some illiterates do such illegal and unlawful acts. in democcracy any question can be asked iwith due regards and protocol and nobody is to take personally. if you are on press you are replying on behalf of your organisation if you have any and by law it should be registered and accepted by members to comment as a spokesperson. personal views can be edited and of no importance and cannot be taken as granted the view of whole religion or community. imam saHIB IS SHAHI IMAM OF JAMA MASJID AND HE MUST BE HAVING A FARMAN OF THEN MUGHAL RULER THAT HIS FAMILY WILL CONTINUE OR HIS SUCCESSORS AS IMAM . I AFTER SOMETIME INTERVIEW HIM AND WILL LIKE TO BRING IN PUBLIC THE THEN ORDER OF MOGHUL EMPEROR FOR MY ARCHIVES AND RECORDS OF NATIONAL MUSEUMS. I AM ALSO TO GET SUCH PHOTOPRINTS FROM OTHER SAJJADANASHINS AND MUTTAWALIS FOR RECORDS. . SEEING SUCH CONTRVERSIES AGAIN ALL SUCH RECORDS NEEDED TO BE VERIFIED AND IF NO RECORDS SOME ALTERNATIVE MEASURE ARE TO BE TAKEN. maula kalam azad during his tenure listed and recorded such records and evidences, registeries,farmans etc and wakf board was formed and administrators and chatertered accountants wre appointed. district magistrates were also attached to the commitees of such wakf properties. but due to no attention of wakf ministries and cooruption the income and property of such were encroached and the care takers are enjoying the funds.
such who are appointed for the job by community should take care of their responsibilities. and to work for the people of their religion. religious people should choose either politics or religious teachings and reforms. hope such will care in welfare of communty. the nationalists citizens of india. those who cannot follow the constitution have alternatives. world is very big to live . almighty god is everywhere .
No comments:
Post a Comment