communalism

communalism is one of the main factor in india due to whisch we are not getting the full majority govt. in central since a long period. due to this thinking their are many parties in india. the idealogy is based on religion though generally people and political parties call themselve non communal. if any party had leaders who must have thought seriously for the cuontry the situatin must have been different. the %of communal people was negligible before british came to india. if this have been the case then mohd bi kasim who came with few hundred people in sind now in pakistan,must not have settled in india. this is the histirical fact that muslims survived in the indian subcontinent due to cooperation extended by the majority of hindus.the %of non muslims was more than muslims in the army of muslim rulers. even mamud ghaznavi who only came to india for money took the help of locals on his way to gujrat. after looting wealth he use to give a part of wealth to professinal fighters of afghanistan,sind,punjab and others. was it had been possible that without support few hundreds of muslims must have survived in india. the story must have been like spain the muslims could only rule till they gave good adminstration. afterwards when they became corrupt they were thrown off. after the origin of islam the muslims rilers ruled well till they were true muslims as soon they became like kings of other part of world they were divided in many countries. this all i am mentioning that muslim initial rulers ruled in many parts of world by their policy of love,equality,justiceand good administration not by power as many say .it was not possible to rule a country in minority.if they have been cruel the majority must not have accepted it .they must have left the country if only people must have attaced or oppsed. it was not a very big task.india had many brave and wise rajputs,yhey also entertained moghuls due to their good rule and reforms which india needed.many staes were always a hindrance to develop the indian continent. the muslimm rulers of all periods ruled with the help of local rajas,commanders,warrors,and army. need always allow compromises.the rulers before muslims invaded india were fed up with regular fights with small states. ater great ashoka india was large in area only in the time of moghul akbar. india developed and organised well in the time of sher shah suri and akbar to shahjehan,thogh in the time of aurangzeb south created lot of problems for him and that was the reason of downfall of moghuls. after the death of aurangzeb again many states emerged and india was again ruled by many. so by diving people in the name of caste and creed india had always faced losses. due to no unity only the 1857 efforts of independance wwas not successful. the british took yhe advange of communal divisin .first east india company weakened indi,made fight between each other. prevented many states to be away from pre independance movement,nizam hyderabad who declared his own state in the time of moghuls joined the english, then old rajah of the south state was taken in favour against hyder ali and tipou sultan. . the britihers knew the soft corner of indians either muslims or hindus,they brought religion in between and were success ful in ruling india for decades,becuse by this time the %of communal people had gone high.
so if religion ever have assoiated with politics,or such people have entered in rule the sub continent have always harmed.the biggest example of it is partition of india. it was only due to communal and opportunists elements. late mohd ali jinnah who became the lader of muslims only taking benifit of this. i do not know how then muslim religious leaders not gave fatwa against him,or why he was not examined that was he a true follower of islam. these political leaders to get their positions and to fulfil their desires are responsible for the death of lakhs of people due to communal rights. coming educated generations when will go through the old journals,newspapers,books,etc will hate them of knowing their reality.
why people instead of such like communaism,opportunism,castism,statism,personalism,and weathism not think of humanity,nationalism,and development of their respective countries.why we not take lesson from past history for a little personal benifit.
i will write more of the historical mistakes which the coming generations will confirm and verify from old records
najeeb khan
india